5 Smartphones Under Rs. 15,000 With Best Battery Life



 Five Smartphones Under Rs. 15,000 With Best Battery Life

Whenever we buy any Smartphone then Everyone needs different things from their phones,some of us want the fastest processors, others want the best cameras, and everyone has a different budget.But one thing  we all look towards in each and every phone in good battery Backup.

Whatever the budget of the Phone we all looks to have a good Battery life!But when its comes to battery life it is believe that only High end Smartphones have good battery life but that is not so.
Even if you're on a smaller budget, there are any number of great handsets you can buy.

Today we brought a list of 5 Smartphones Under Rs. 15,000 With Best Battery Life and Good Performance!

1) Lenovo Zuk Z1



Rs. 13,499

The Lenovo Zuk Z1 has good ratings overall, but its battery rating of 9 really stands out. The phone is powered by a 2.5GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 processor, and comes with 3GB of RAM and a 5.5-inch full-HD display, but despite demanding specs, delivers a great battery experience thanks to a huge 4100mAh battery - it lasted for 13 hours, 40 minutes in our video loop test, and would last well over a day on a full charge, despite heavy use.


  • Looks good, well built
  • Good screen customisation features
  • Great software
  • Decent camera
  • Good battery life


  • Unlocking the phone isn't as easy as it could be
  • Dated SoC
  • No expandable storage
  • Only available through flash sales

2) Yu Yunicorn 


Launched in June, the Yu Yunicorn has a large 4000mAh battery powering a 5.5-inch HD display, 4GB of RAM, and a 1.4GHz octa-core MediaTek Helio P10 processor. The phone's major weakness is its camera - but if that's not too important for you, then the phone is a pretty good pick too. And in our review, the battery lasted for 14 hours, 46 minutes on the video loop test, which is fantastic - for regular use, you could sometimes go two days between charges.

3) LG K10 LTE










Rs. 12,290

The phone comes with a reasonably sized 2300mAh removable battery but makes up for it by having components that aren't too demanding either - there's a 1.2GHz quad-core Snapdragon 410 processor, 2GB of RAM, and a 5.3-inch HD display. The phone lasted 10 hours 24 minutes in the battery test, and typically lasted more than a day of regular use.

The phone's biggest shortcoming is its camera, and its relatively high price, but its battery stands out. You can also check out its lower-end sibling, the LG K7 LTE.


  • Sleek design
  • Good build quality
  • Good battery life
  • Display is legible in sunlight


  • No USB OTG
  • Average performance
  • High launch price

4) Xolo Era 4K






Rs. 5,999

One of the cheapest phones on this list, the Xolo Era 4K comes with a 5-inch display, running at 720x1280 pixels. The phone is powered by a 1GHz quad-core processor and 2GB of RAM, which is fairly standard for the price, but what makes it stand out is the 4000mAh battery. The phone went for 12 hours, 55 minutes on the video loop test, and lasted over a day in ordinary use. What's more, the bundled 10W charger is quick to top up the battery too.


  • Good battery life
  • Near-stock Android
  • 4G connectivity on either SIM


  • Photos lack detail
  • 8GB of internal storage
  • Wi-Fi is unstable

5) InFocus Bingo 21







Rs. 6,990

This 4.5-inch phone is the smallest on the list, and packs only a 2300mAh battery. Despite that, it scored well on the battery test, possibly because of its otherwise very middling specifications. The display and camera are particularly weak, and unless you're solely concerned about the battery life, we wouldn't go with this phone. That being said, if you want to be able to go a long time between charges on a tight budget, then this phone is an option.

It lasted 12 hours and 2 minutes of the video loop test, and in real world usage, easily went more than a full day on a single charge.


  • Good battery life
  • Decent build quality
  • Supports 4G


  • Low resolution display
  • Weak overall performance
  • Camera quality is sub-par
  • A tad bulky


No comments:

Powered by Blogger.